Are we being too quick to ‘damn’ the ‘dams’? Is it better for the environment if we humans produce 1,000,000 water tanks and the required pipes, pumps, controls and labour or alternately build a 1,000,000 person supplying dam using the utility approach?

I got to thinking about this today whilst looking into water tanks. My collegue Peter Cooper at Saasu.com suggested maybe we should look at more localized dams. I think this is actually quite sensible if sites are available. Don’t think for a second that I don’t like water tanks. My gut feeling is telling me I should have one. I’d just like to be certain (thinking more like an engineer) that the distributed environmental impact of producing water tanks is actually less than the centralised environmental impact of the utility approach of dam building. Any ideas so I can make a decision?
