<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social enterprise - needing a little more science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/04/social-enterprise-needing-a-little-more-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/04/social-enterprise-needing-a-little-more-science/</link>
	<description>are you playing the game or watching from the stands?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/04/social-enterprise-needing-a-little-more-science/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 17:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/04/social-enterprise-needing-a-little-more-science/#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Agree, hope I didn't infer that in my writing :( 
I don't like Web 2.0 term much I must admit but for the case of this point I see web 2.0 technologies just as enablers. Just like bloomberg was a social tool for bank traders sharing mkt knowledge, prices, products on permissioned basis to other bloomberg users starting way back in the 80's!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, hope I didn&#8217;t infer that in my writing <img src='http://www.marclehmann.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I don&#8217;t like Web 2.0 term much I must admit but for the case of this point I see web 2.0 technologies just as enablers. Just like bloomberg was a social tool for bank traders sharing mkt knowledge, prices, products on permissioned basis to other bloomberg users starting way back in the 80&#8217;s!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/04/social-enterprise-needing-a-little-more-science/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 22:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/04/social-enterprise-needing-a-little-more-science/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Marc, I'm flattered you put me alongside Ross here in Australia, but I'll gladly take the slot. I've had the discussion recently that Enterprise 2.0 &lt;em&gt;is not&lt;/em&gt; Web 2.0. The mindset and values that drive the Web 2.0 companies - openness, freedom, sharing, etc. don't work quite the same way inside the walls of big business, Don't get me wrong, I think that a large number of Web 2.0 tools can and should be used by business. But the people wanting them, their manager and the vendors all need to get their heads around a slightly different, more structured set of best practices before likely success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, I&#8217;m flattered you put me alongside Ross here in Australia, but I&#8217;ll gladly take the slot. I&#8217;ve had the discussion recently that Enterprise 2.0 <em>is not</em> Web 2.0. The mindset and values that drive the Web 2.0 companies - openness, freedom, sharing, etc. don&#8217;t work quite the same way inside the walls of big business, Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I think that a large number of Web 2.0 tools can and should be used by business. But the people wanting them, their manager and the vendors all need to get their heads around a slightly different, more structured set of best practices before likely success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/04/social-enterprise-needing-a-little-more-science/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/04/social-enterprise-needing-a-little-more-science/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Thanks Roger. Your right about a simple access or no-access approach being less than ideal. If the tools are there to manage it any other way than that, then I'd use them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Roger. Your right about a simple access or no-access approach being less than ideal. If the tools are there to manage it any other way than that, then I&#8217;d use them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger W. Farnsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/04/social-enterprise-needing-a-little-more-science/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger W. Farnsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/04/social-enterprise-needing-a-little-more-science/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Great points.  I think one of the hardest parts about social networking making the leap to the enterprise is the perception of managers.  Most only have experience with social networking through the buzz and fritter crowd.

Most companies are focused on systems today; they have a couple of hundred years worth of experience that tells them that's where the optimisation opportunities are.  But the organisation of the future will be driven to a greater extent by personal innovation and knowledge networks.

I wrote about that not too long ago here:
http://ciscoetl.wordpress.com/2008/03/09/ill-have-a-large-order-of-productivity-with-a-side-of/

Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points.  I think one of the hardest parts about social networking making the leap to the enterprise is the perception of managers.  Most only have experience with social networking through the buzz and fritter crowd.</p>
<p>Most companies are focused on systems today; they have a couple of hundred years worth of experience that tells them that&#8217;s where the optimisation opportunities are.  But the organisation of the future will be driven to a greater extent by personal innovation and knowledge networks.</p>
<p>I wrote about that not too long ago here:<br />
<a href="http://ciscoetl.wordpress.com/2008/03/09/ill-have-a-large-order-of-productivity-with-a-side-of/" rel="nofollow">http://ciscoetl.wordpress.com/2008/03/09/ill-have-a-large-order-of-productivity-with-a-side-of/</a></p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook &#187; Social enterprise - needing a little more science</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/04/social-enterprise-needing-a-little-more-science/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook &#187; Social enterprise - needing a little more science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/04/social-enterprise-needing-a-little-more-science/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>[...] Marc wrote an interesting post today on Social enterprise - needing a little more scienceHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIf in managing the flow of information in tools like Facebook can only be served by blocking certain users and allowing others then thatâ€™s justified but far from ideal. Many roles in organisations may not be well served by these tools &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marc wrote an interesting post today on Social enterprise - needing a little more scienceHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIf in managing the flow of information in tools like Facebook can only be served by blocking certain users and allowing others then thatâ€™s justified but far from ideal. Many roles in organisations may not be well served by these tools &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
