<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t dish the meeting, it&#8217;s a cheap call option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/05/dont-dish-the-meeting-its-a-cheap-call-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/05/dont-dish-the-meeting-its-a-cheap-call-option/</link>
	<description>are you playing the game or watching from the stands?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/05/dont-dish-the-meeting-its-a-cheap-call-option/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/05/dont-dish-the-meeting-its-a-cheap-call-option/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>email is a classic example, i'd forgotten all about that. i use a lot of smiley faces etc so people don't take things the wrong way. feels a bit childish sometimes but it's better than offending someone through an ambiguous statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>email is a classic example, i&#8217;d forgotten all about that. i use a lot of smiley faces etc so people don&#8217;t take things the wrong way. feels a bit childish sometimes but it&#8217;s better than offending someone through an ambiguous statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/05/dont-dish-the-meeting-its-a-cheap-call-option/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/2008/05/dont-dish-the-meeting-its-a-cheap-call-option/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Absolutely totally agree.  I understand what the "time efficiency champions" are saying, and I really understand after a bad meeting!!  However you are right when you say that you can't predict what the results will be every time.  The amount of times that an idea or a direction change has occurred from talking with other people is amazing.

Add into the equation the amount of times that email communication has turned sour - people either not reading the email properly or taking it in a way that it wasn't meant, you can come up with some very good reasons face to face is still the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely totally agree.  I understand what the &#8220;time efficiency champions&#8221; are saying, and I really understand after a bad meeting!!  However you are right when you say that you can&#8217;t predict what the results will be every time.  The amount of times that an idea or a direction change has occurred from talking with other people is amazing.</p>
<p>Add into the equation the amount of times that email communication has turned sour - people either not reading the email properly or taking it in a way that it wasn&#8217;t meant, you can come up with some very good reasons face to face is still the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
