<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for A Meaningful Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marclehmann.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marclehmann.net</link>
	<description>Marc Lehmann's Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on No News(corp) at Google by Josh Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2009/12/no-newscorp-at-google/comment-page-1/#comment-16496</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/?p=553#comment-16496</guid>
		<description>A quick add - ABC website today has a good summary from their perspective  &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/8WYUv4" title="ABC Website"

They are branching out, much further than any other media group. While other media outlets were optimising their websites for mobile, the main menu on my Playstation 3 which used to have five icons including games and movies all of a sudden had ABC iView.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick add - ABC website today has a good summary from their perspective  &lt;a href=&#8221;http://bit.ly/8WYUv4&#8243; title=&#8221;ABC Website&#8221;</p>
<p>They are branching out, much further than any other media group. While other media outlets were optimising their websites for mobile, the main menu on my Playstation 3 which used to have five icons including games and movies all of a sudden had ABC iView.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No News(corp) at Google by Josh Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2009/12/no-newscorp-at-google/comment-page-1/#comment-16336</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/?p=553#comment-16336</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with you Marc. I don't feel sorry for newsprint, the most radical shift in their business model over the last xx years was web which  all business has had to adapt to. Get their already digital content, cut it down, and send to web. Easy. 

So the game has changed, I can now receive my news from Google, aggregated from thousands of sources, packaged up on their platform with advertising displayed relevant to my interests.

They could take the Sensis approach and battle on until they serve no purpose.

A good parallel is Google real estate- a mashup of web scraped sales and rental data sourced from multiple sites, overlaid onto Google Maps. This is a serious threat to the likes of realestate.com.au and Domain. 

For some properties on Google Realestate, the quality of the data presented is pretty average. But for others its excellent, great quality photos, youtube videos, excellent descriptions and simple filtering. These are the companies that have aligned commercially with Google, have share arrangements on adwords revenue (thats an assumption btw) and provide rich data to the end user. Win Win for all!

If I was Murdoch for a day I would continue print until its redundant, build commercial deals with the likes of Google, Youtube etc to share advertising revenue on quality content and source more niche areas to offer content (high quality optimised app for the iPad at $15 a pop?). I'd buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with you Marc. I don&#8217;t feel sorry for newsprint, the most radical shift in their business model over the last xx years was web which  all business has had to adapt to. Get their already digital content, cut it down, and send to web. Easy. </p>
<p>So the game has changed, I can now receive my news from Google, aggregated from thousands of sources, packaged up on their platform with advertising displayed relevant to my interests.</p>
<p>They could take the Sensis approach and battle on until they serve no purpose.</p>
<p>A good parallel is Google real estate- a mashup of web scraped sales and rental data sourced from multiple sites, overlaid onto Google Maps. This is a serious threat to the likes of realestate.com.au and Domain. </p>
<p>For some properties on Google Realestate, the quality of the data presented is pretty average. But for others its excellent, great quality photos, youtube videos, excellent descriptions and simple filtering. These are the companies that have aligned commercially with Google, have share arrangements on adwords revenue (thats an assumption btw) and provide rich data to the end user. Win Win for all!</p>
<p>If I was Murdoch for a day I would continue print until its redundant, build commercial deals with the likes of Google, Youtube etc to share advertising revenue on quality content and source more niche areas to offer content (high quality optimised app for the iPad at $15 a pop?). I&#8217;d buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caleb Playing Clocks by Coldplay by Vitania</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2010/01/caleb-playing-clocks-by-coldplay/comment-page-1/#comment-15043</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/?p=567#comment-15043</guid>
		<description>This is so fabulous!  It's so great to watch children gravitate "naturally"  to their talents.  We spend so much time shoving stuff in their face,  we don't give them much time to explore themselves...  what a wonderful accomplishement for Caleb !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so fabulous!  It&#8217;s so great to watch children gravitate &#8220;naturally&#8221;  to their talents.  We spend so much time shoving stuff in their face,  we don&#8217;t give them much time to explore themselves&#8230;  what a wonderful accomplishement for Caleb !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caleb Playing Clocks by Coldplay by Marc Lehmann</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2010/01/caleb-playing-clocks-by-coldplay/comment-page-1/#comment-13013</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Lehmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/?p=567#comment-13013</guid>
		<description>@ben he's actually got me keen to learn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ben he&#8217;s actually got me keen to learn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caleb Playing Clocks by Coldplay by Ben Kepes</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2010/01/caleb-playing-clocks-by-coldplay/comment-page-1/#comment-12941</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kepes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/?p=567#comment-12941</guid>
		<description>Nice work Marc, and congrats Caleb - you did well...

I'm a terrible site reader and tended to learn music by ear (despite a few years of formal piano lessons_ - It'd be worth getting Caleb lessons - hell, my wife would teach him (oh yeah, there's that minor distance thing...)

If music be the food of love, play on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work Marc, and congrats Caleb - you did well&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a terrible site reader and tended to learn music by ear (despite a few years of formal piano lessons_ - It&#8217;d be worth getting Caleb lessons - hell, my wife would teach him (oh yeah, there&#8217;s that minor distance thing&#8230;)</p>
<p>If music be the food of love, play on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No News(corp) at Google by Marc Lehmann</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2009/12/no-newscorp-at-google/comment-page-1/#comment-12830</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Lehmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/?p=553#comment-12830</guid>
		<description>@namit

I think if you have quality content or applications you should charge for them so I agree with Newscorp. Pay for content is a returns reasonable position to take. Else, if you want to give the content away to foster other means of revenue then I agree with that strategy also. I think Newscorp will struggle if they charge to maintain their current high volumes of traffic but it will probably improve profitability in net terms. So you have less customers but they pay you. I think the hybrid approach they are going for is right. It's a spectrum. The company I own shares in, Saasu, has a Google like approach - charge small dollars for powerful app and go for lots of customers. Then provide a free low use offering.

I don't feel sorry for newsprint. They can change their business model if they want. They choose to copy their competitors model. Crikey as an example didn't they took a subscription stance a long time ago. Hats off to them for bucking the trend early!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@namit</p>
<p>I think if you have quality content or applications you should charge for them so I agree with Newscorp. Pay for content is a returns reasonable position to take. Else, if you want to give the content away to foster other means of revenue then I agree with that strategy also. I think Newscorp will struggle if they charge to maintain their current high volumes of traffic but it will probably improve profitability in net terms. So you have less customers but they pay you. I think the hybrid approach they are going for is right. It&#8217;s a spectrum. The company I own shares in, Saasu, has a Google like approach - charge small dollars for powerful app and go for lots of customers. Then provide a free low use offering.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel sorry for newsprint. They can change their business model if they want. They choose to copy their competitors model. Crikey as an example didn&#8217;t they took a subscription stance a long time ago. Hats off to them for bucking the trend early!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No News(corp) at Google by Namit Trivedi</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2009/12/no-newscorp-at-google/comment-page-1/#comment-12379</link>
		<dc:creator>Namit Trivedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/?p=553#comment-12379</guid>
		<description>Marc, fair enough. But what's your opinion on the part of Newscorp ? I am split on this issue.I see media organisations as packaging companies. Packaging companies don't own the product they package do they ? ie Tetrapak. So i guess the way forward for them is to utilise traffic and channel it through a revenue stream on their own websites.Period. 

On the otherhand, i also feel sorry for the entire newsprint industry in general. poor buggers. In a way Rupert Murdoch is the only one fighting on behalf of the entire industry. I guess the rest have realised that their gravy trains are pulling into the end of their respective lines.   
     

N</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, fair enough. But what&#8217;s your opinion on the part of Newscorp ? I am split on this issue.I see media organisations as packaging companies. Packaging companies don&#8217;t own the product they package do they ? ie Tetrapak. So i guess the way forward for them is to utilise traffic and channel it through a revenue stream on their own websites.Period. </p>
<p>On the otherhand, i also feel sorry for the entire newsprint industry in general. poor buggers. In a way Rupert Murdoch is the only one fighting on behalf of the entire industry. I guess the rest have realised that their gravy trains are pulling into the end of their respective lines.   </p>
<p>N</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Teens Don&#8217;t Twitter by Stilgherrian &#183; Bonus Link Megamix for February (so far)</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2009/02/why-teens-dont-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-10878</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; Bonus Link Megamix for February (so far)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/?p=237#comment-10878</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Teens Don&#8217;t Twitter &#124; A Meaningful Life: Marc Lehmann&#8217;s take on the reason for the (apparent) older demographic profile of Twitter users. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Teens Don&#8217;t Twitter | A Meaningful Life: Marc Lehmann&#8217;s take on the reason for the (apparent) older demographic profile of Twitter users. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Teens Don&#8217;t Twitter by Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2009/02/why-teens-dont-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-8738</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 02:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/?p=237#comment-8738</guid>
		<description>@sammy. there's nothing wrong with a demographic inventing a new way of communicating. i don't think using chatspeak makes anyone an idiot. unless it's not appropriate for a situation. e.g. writing a book. if lots of people like it as a faster method then it will take of naturally. that's probably a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sammy. there&#8217;s nothing wrong with a demographic inventing a new way of communicating. i don&#8217;t think using chatspeak makes anyone an idiot. unless it&#8217;s not appropriate for a situation. e.g. writing a book. if lots of people like it as a faster method then it will take of naturally. that&#8217;s probably a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Teens Don&#8217;t Twitter by Sammy</title>
		<link>http://www.marclehmann.net/2009/02/why-teens-dont-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-8656</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marclehmann.net/?p=237#comment-8656</guid>
		<description>"# It’s not an SMS killer when it comes to communicating with their friends…yet. They tend to SMS in less than 50 characters in chatspeak (textese) and it is more efficient arguably."

Not all teens type like idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;# It’s not an SMS killer when it comes to communicating with their friends…yet. They tend to SMS in less than 50 characters in chatspeak (textese) and it is more efficient arguably.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not all teens type like idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
